top of page

Analyzing the 10-Year Ownership Cost of the Ather Rizta Z 3.7

  • 3 days ago
  • 3 min read

When evaluating the true value of an electric vehicle, analyzing the long-term running costs is essential. This breakdown provides a comprehensive 10-year ownership cost comparison for the Ather Rizta Z 3.7. To provide an accurate baseline, these projections assume a daily running distance of 50 km and an electricity rate of ₹8 per unit, based on Delhi pricing.


10-Year Ownership Cost of the Ather Rizta Z 3.7
10-Year Ownership Cost of the Ather Rizta Z 3.7

In the rapidly evolving landscape of electric vehicles, the Ather Rizta Z 3.7 emerges as a compelling option for urban commuters. As consumers increasingly consider electric scooters, understanding the long-term financial implications of ownership is crucial. This article provides a detailed analysis of the Ather Rizta Z 3.7's running costs over a 10-year period, offering a comprehensive comparison with a traditional petrol scooter, the Suzuki Access 125, and exploring various charging scenarios.


Understanding the Cost Components


The total cost of ownership for any vehicle extends beyond its initial purchase price. For electric scooters like the Ather Rizta Z 3.7, key factors include electricity consumption, routine maintenance, insurance, and tire replacements. The provided data, based on an electricity cost of ₹8 per unit in Delhi and a daily running of 50 km, offers a clear picture of these expenses.


Electricity Consumption


The Ather Rizta Z 3.7 boasts a real-world range of 115 km per full charge. Accounting for a 10% charging loss, a full 0-100% charge for its 3.7 kWh battery consumes approximately 4.07 units of electricity. At ₹8 per unit, a single full charge costs ₹32.56. For a weekly running cost, assuming 4 charges, this amounts to ₹130.24.


Charging Scenarios and Their Impact


The choice of charging method significantly influences the overall electricity cost. The analysis considers three primary scenarios:

  • Standard 350W Home Charger: This option, taking 6 to 8 hours for a full charge, results in an annual electricity cost of ₹6,772, leading to a 10-year total of ₹67,720.

  • Duo Charger 700W: Offering a faster charge (3.5 hours for 0-80%), the 10-year cost remains the same at ₹67,720.

  • Standard 350W Charger + Public Grid Charging: This hybrid approach, involving one public grid charge per week (45 minutes at ₹1.18/minute = ₹53.10) alongside home charging (3 charges at ₹32.56 = ₹97.68 weekly), results in a higher 10-year cost of ₹78,400.

  • Solar System (2kW): For those with a 2kW solar system, both standard 350W and Duo 700W chargers incur a variable electricity cost of ₹0, making it the most economical option for charging.


10-Year Ownership Cost Comparison: Ather Rizta Z 3.7 vs. Suzuki Access 125


To provide a holistic view, a direct comparison with a popular petrol scooter, the Suzuki Access 125, is presented. This table breaks down the costs across various categories.

Category

Suzuki Access 125 (Approx.)

Ather Rizta Z 3.7 (Approx.)

On-road Price

₹1,05,000

₹1,68,000

Power/Fuel Consumption

₹3,84,350 (₹94.77/L, 45kmpl)

₹67,720

Maintenance

₹55,000

₹40,000

Insurance

₹28,000

₹35,000

Tyres

₹26,600 (7 full sets)

₹49,500 (9 full sets)

Total (without inflation)

₹5.98 lakh

₹3.59 lakh

The Impact of Inflation and Battery Replacement


The long-term cost analysis also factors in inflation and the eventual need for battery replacement, which is a significant consideration for electric vehicles.

  • Total (with battery replacement in 9th year): ₹4.19 lakh (Estimated battery replacement cost: ₹60,000)

  • Total (with inflation): ₹7.31 lakh for Suzuki Access 125 (Petrol prices 5% p.a., Electricity 4% p.a., Service & Tyres 6% p.a., Insurance 5% p.a.) and ₹4.51 lakh for Ather Rizta Z 3.7 (considering similar inflation rates for electricity, service, tyres, and insurance, plus battery replacement in the 9th year).


Conclusion


The Ather Rizta Z 3.7 demonstrates a clear advantage in long-term running costs compared to its petrol counterpart, the Suzuki Access 125. While the initial on-road price of the electric scooter is higher, the substantial savings in power/fuel consumption and maintenance costs over a decade make it a more economical choice. Even with the consideration of battery replacement and inflation, the Ather Rizta Z 3.7 presents a significantly lower total cost of ownership, reinforcing the financial benefits of transitioning to electric mobility.


Note: All figures are approximate. Electricity charges and fuel prices may vary by state, impacting overall ownership expenditure.



 
 
bottom of page